
Najib: Jews Jews Jews Jews CIA CIA CIA Jews CIA
|
With elections looming and the outcome probably closer than ever before, the government goes on the attack
(In recent weeks, the Malaysian government has staged an
unprecedented number of attacks on various political reform NGOs in
Malaysia, accusing them of being in the pay of foreign forces – usually
the CIA or the Israeli government or that most prominent bete noir,
George Soros, attempting to destabilize the country. This suggests that
the US and Israel don’t have their hands full with Iran, China, Russia
and other problems. Malaysiakini, an online news publication with which
Asia Sentinel has a content-sharing agreement, has come under particular
attack. Premesh Chandran, the news portal’s CEO, takes on the
government in an op-ed piece which we are happy to reprint. If printing
the truth destabilizes a country, so be it – Eds.)
The attacks against
Malaysiakini signal that the government is getting desperate.
For the past week, the mainstream media -
TV3, Utusan Malaysia, New Straits Times and
The Star - have launched an attack on
Malaysiakini
and civil society organizations for receiving grants from international
foundations in what they claimed is a plot to destabilise the
government.
Malaysiakini has been further attacked for having a foreign
investor which is allegedly linked to billionaire financier George
Soros. Further aspersions have been cast on
Malaysiakini that some of our shareholders have political links.
I understand the reason for the attacks. After all, elections are around
the corner, and by all accounts, the results could go either way.
Hence, the mainstream media have been ordered by their political owners –
the United Malays National Organization and the Malaysian Chinese
Association - to attack and discredit voices that are calling for free
and fair elections, for investigations into various corruption scandals
and for democratic principles to be observed and upheld.
It is no surprise that they repeatedly report accusations, insinuations
and half-truths, along with an ugly dose of racism - a strategy
perfected by none other than Nazi propaganda chief Joseph Goebbels.
Let’s look into these accusations one by one and put them to bed:
1. Same accusation 11 years ago
Former
Malaysiakini news editor YL Chong’s repeated accusations
that in 2001 we hid a RM188,000 grant from Media Development Loan Fund
(MDLF) and that he resigned after taking a stand on the matter. This
accusation is not new. It was paraded in the mainstream media 11 years
ago - back in 2001 - as “proof” of our links to Soros. We published our
rebuttal shortly after those accusations were made.
In a nutshell,
Malaysiakini was open with its staff about a
contract to build a software application for the Centre for Advanced
Media Prague (Camp), which is MDLF’s technology division.
Chong went to the media with the accusation that the deal was a grant and we’re hiding the deal. In fact,
Malaysiakini had already made an announcement of the software deal on the site.
The question is, why would
Malaysiakini be so open with its staff on the deal. Wouldn’t it have made more sense to keep
Malaysiakini staff in the dark?
2. 'Soros man on Malaysiakini board'
On the back of successfully completing the technology development and
successfully launching a subscription model in January 2002, MDLF
decided to invest in
Malaysiakini - their first in an online
medium, breaking away from their traditional investment in newspapers,
television and radio stations.
Malaysiakini received RM1.3 million for 29 percent of equity and
MDLF agreed to sign an editorial non-intervention agreement. Following
that,
Malaysiakini held a press conference and made an
announcement about the matter.
At the time of the investment, MDLF was led by its co-founder Sasa
Vucinic, a journalist whose independent radio station B92 in Belgrade
fought a long and hard battle to help bring down Serbian president
Slobodan Milosevic.
Milosevic was subsequently charged with war crimes and crimes against
humanity in connection with wars in Bosnia, Croatia and Kosovo.
Sasa went on to set up MDLF with the strategy of helping independent
media in Eastern Europe grow following the fall of communism. Soros, a
Hungarian with a track record of supporting press freedom, was among the
many
major donors of MDLF.
Do watch Sasa’s fantastic
TED talk to know more about MDLF’s philosophy.
To date, MDLF is involved in 269 projects for 85 independent media
companies in 27 countries. Not only does MDLF have a right to be on
Malaysiakini’s
board given its stake in the company, it is hardly business sense for
us to pass on the opportunity to have such distinguished individuals to
serve on our board.
The advice and guidance from MDLF and their current CEO, Harlan Mandel, have been a tremendous boost to
Malaysiakini’s business strategy.
How is Mandel a Soros man? Indeed, using the tenuous link between MDLF
and Soros to argue that somehow MDLF is doing Soros’s bidding is
definitely straight out of the Goebbels handbook.
3. But why attack Soros?
The entire attack by the mainstream media is premised on a link between
Malaysiakini and Soros. But why the hatred of Soros?
The Malaysian central bank chose to gamble our hard-earned reserves on
defending the pound. When the pound collapsed in 1992, Malaysia was left
with a major hole in the Treasury, and Soros made a name for himself
for breaking the Bank of England.
Instead of asking why was our central bank engaged in highly speculative and risky action, Malaysia
attacked Soros.
Despite a heated exchange of words in the wake of the Asian financial crisis, former PM Dr Mahathir Mohamad later
conceded
that Soros was not responsible for the damage to Malaysia. Mahathir
subsequently met Soros in Kuala Lumpur and asked for his support for his
global campaign to outlaw war.
During his visit to Malaysia, Soros met with a host of government and business leaders.
We have even heard of there were subsequent private meetings between
Soros and top Umno leaders, which to date have gone unreported but will
come to light soon.
4. Malaysiakini gets grants from foreign donors
The mainstream media have portrayed that
Malaysiakini has been
hiding the fact that we receive grants from international donors and we
now “admit” to this long-hidden fact. The truth is that
Malaysiakini has always declared the
grants it receives.
Malaysiakini funds its core activities from subscription and
advertising revenues. Grants are used to fund projects that are of
social benefit but are not likely to be revenue generating or
profitable.
So while
Malaysiakini as a whole is a for-profit organisation, we do solicit funds to support our “non-profit” projects.
For example,
Malaysiakini trained over 300 citizen journalists around Malaysia and established a website called
www.cj.my.
Malaysiakini also established
Komunitikini.com to encourage local news coverage.
Malaysiakini built
Undi.info to provide electoral information and
Digitalibrary.my as an online archive of important documents.
5. Malaysiakini has opposition figures as shareholders
In order to start up
Malaysiakini, the founders invested their own funds and appealed to friends in civil society for investment in 1999.
R Sivarasa, then a prominent human rights activist had yet to join any
political party; Sivarasa’s sister-in-law, Mary Agnes, who is a banker;
Bruno Pereira, a prominent trade unionist; and Joseph Paul, also a human
rights activist; took the risk to make the initial investment in
Malaysiakini. Their contribution was converted to shares and they represent not more than a couple of percent of the company.
Up to this date, unfortunately, they and other shareholders have not
received any dividends but we hope their investments have been
worthwhile. In no way do any of the shareholders have an influence in
Malaysiakini.
The Selangor MB’s press secretary, Arfa'eza Aziz, is a former
Malaysiakini journalist, a fact conveniently omitted by The Star’s
report. She, along with 50 other
Malaysiakini staff, hold shares amounting to about 12 percent of the company.
6. Malaysiakini is controlled by outside forces
Nothing can be further from the truth. Despite many offers to buy
Malaysiakini, the founders continue to hold on to their majority stake.
Malaysiakini asks our readers to pay a subscription fee so that
Malaysiakini
remains financially independent and does not have to seek funding for
its core operations. Who would know best about how editorial decisions
are made but our editors and journalists?
Over 13 years, hundreds have worked on our editorial floor. If asked, I
believe they will tell a tale of hard work and long hours, but never a
tale of stories being spiked, censored or twisted to suite external
powers, something so prevalent in the newsrooms of politically-owned
media.
Editorial decisions rest with the editorial desk and the editor-in-chief, and that is the way it should be.
We do not believe the accusations against
Malaysiakini will
stop. After all, desperate times require desperate measures.
Nevertheless, for those who are really interested to know more about
Malaysiakini, we are more than happy to talk to them.
Besides that, we need to get on with our job of reporting the news that matters, without fear or favour.
(Premesh Chandran is chief executive officer of Malaysiakini)